Commentary · Oct 4, 2026

    Poland's 2027 defence budget stops rising, and the fifty-fifty domestic claim cannot be checked

    Poland's Council of Ministers adopted the 2027 budget bill on 29 September; the August draft set defence at 198.1 billion zloty, 4.5% of GDP, against 200 billion and 4.8% for 2026. Ministers say half of equipment orders now go to Polish firms, but the published domestic spend is 30.4 billion zloty.

    Soldiers in uniform march during a military parade featuring diverse troops and spectators.
    Victor Bogdan / Pexels
    Contents

    Key takeaways

    • Poland's draft 2027 budget sets defence at 198.1 billion zloty, 4.5% of GDP, with total expenditure of 977.6 billion zloty and a general government deficit of 282.6 billion zloty or 7.1% of GDP; the Council of Ministers adopted the budget bill on 29 September (Notes from Poland; Ministry of Finance).
    • Defence Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz said at MSPO on 8 September that Poland had "reached a level of fifty-fifty" between domestic purchases and imports, while Reuters reported on 1 September that spending with domestic companies reached 30.4 billion zloty, about $8.15bn, in the previous year; the basis for neither figure is published (Defense News, Reuters).
    • Poland signed a further $4bn US Foreign Military Financing agreement on 9 September, worth 14.8 billion zloty and aimed at accelerating the 96 AH-64E Apaches ordered in 2024 for about $10bn, bringing cumulative FMF support to nearly $20bn across six agreements (Notes from Poland).
    • Moody's cut Poland from A2 to A3 on 18 September, its lowest since 2002, citing persistent large deficits and naming "high social and defence spending" among constraints; public debt passed 60% of GDP in the first quarter of 2026 (Notes from Poland).

    Poland's Council of Ministers adopted the 2027 budget bill on 29 September, according to the Ministry of Finance's own announcement. The draft the government set out on 28 August put defence at 198.1 billion zloty, or 4.5% of GDP, against total expenditure of 977.6 billion zloty and a deficit of 7.1% of GDP, Notes from Poland reported; for 2026 the same outlet reported a record 200 billion zloty and 4.8%. On the published figures, NATO's largest relative defence spender has planned a year in which defence stops rising, in zloty and as a share of output, even as ministers describe an industrial expansion financed by it. The question is what the 2027 money buys, and whether the claim that half of it goes to Polish firms can be checked.

    What the 2027 budget commits, and what it does not

    The 2027 draft is an expansionary budget that is not expanding on defence. Revenue is projected at 695 billion zloty, gross borrowing needs at 565 billion and debt-servicing costs at 107 billion, on growth of 3% and inflation of 2.8%. Healthcare rises by 26.3 billion zloty; defence does not rise. Finance Minister Andrzej Domanski said equipment deliveries forecast for next year would be record-breaking — a statement about deliveries arriving, not about new commitments.

    Analysts at ING Bank Slaski were blunter: "The 2027 budget represents a continuation of expansionary fiscal policy, and Poland is making no progress in correcting its excessive deficit and is taking no action to bring it below 3% of GDP." Poland was placed under the EU's excessive deficit procedure in 2024 and had committed to 3.7% by 2027.

    One caution on definitions: the headline defence figure combines the state budget with the Armed Forces Support Fund, the off-budget vehicle that borrows against future appropriations, and the published summaries do not separate them. A flat headline is therefore not proof that commitments have flattened — it is equally consistent with the fund carrying more of the load.

    The domestic share: two numbers that do not agree

    At the opening of the MSPO exhibition in Kielce on 8 September, Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz said, in remarks reported by Defense News: "We have reached a level of fifty-fifty [between domestic military gear purchases and imports]." He credited the EU facility: "This would not happen without the SAFE mechanism." His benchmark was Turkey, where he said domestic producers now supply about 80% of national requirements.

    The other published number is smaller. Reuters reported on 1 September that Polish defence spending with domestic companies had risen nearly four-fold since 2022, to 30.4 billion zloty — about 8.15 billion dollars — in the previous year, while core defence spending in 2026 would be roughly 53 billion euros, up from 44 billion in 2025. Deputy State Assets Minister Konrad Golota put the industrial policy plainly: "If you want to sell in Poland, you have to invest in Poland, you have to transfer technology."

    The two cannot be reconciled from what has been published. They are compatible only if they count different things — orders placed in a year against cash actually paid to Polish suppliers, or contract value including future assembly against money that reached Polish plants. Neither the defence ministry nor the Armament Agency has published the basis, so fifty-fifty remains a ministerial characterisation rather than a measured share.

    Where the money has gone: Gliwice, Seoul and Washington

    The industrial story is real but back-loaded. On 27 April 2026 Bumar-Labedy and Hyundai Rotem signed a subcontracting agreement covering assembly and polonisation of the K2PL, Notes from Poland reported: 61 Polish-assembled tanks and 72 support vehicles, with production in Gliwice starting in 2028 — the first Polish tank output since the PT-91M in 2009. The 2025 order was 180 tanks, 64 of them K2PL, worth 6.7 billion dollars, within a programme of up to 1,000 K2s and more than 500 built domestically. The Polish share of that is paid from 2028, not in 2027.

    The near-term payments go abroad. On 9 September Poland signed a further 4 billion dollar Foreign Military Financing agreement with the United States, worth 14.8 billion zloty and meant to accelerate existing contracts, chiefly the 96 AH-64E Apaches ordered in 2024 for about 10 billion dollars; cumulative FMF support now runs to nearly 20 billion dollars across six agreements, Notes from Poland reported. Kosiniak-Kamysz called it a mark of standing: "FMF is granted only to the best allies."

    Domestic orders grow from a lower base. Defense News reported Poland's 43.7 billion euro SAFE allocation, the largest under the 150 billion euro scheme, and an air-defence framework worth more than 8 billion zloty for Piorun missiles with Norway, Lithuania and Latvia as participants. The heavy fighting vehicle shown at Kielce reaches a prototype in 2027 and serial production in 2029.

    The fiscal constraint arrived before the industrial one

    On 18 September Moody's cut Poland's rating from A2 to A3, its lowest since 2002, citing that "large fiscal deficits persist, leading to a material increase in public debt" and naming "high social and defence spending" among the factors narrowing consolidation options. Public debt passed 60% of GDP in the first quarter of 2026 for the first time, and the 2025 deficit was 7.3% of GDP, the EU's second-highest. Domanski's response was measured: "We take this decision seriously, but calmly."

    NATO's figures give the absorption problem its shape. For 2025 the alliance recorded Poland at 4.5% of GDP with 54.4% of the defence budget going to equipment, the highest equipment share in NATO. A budget weighted that heavily toward procurement is the hardest kind to spend well: it depends on deliveries and factories, not payroll — and much of the Polish capacity arrives after 2028.

    What to watch

    • Whether the Sejm obtains a split of the 198.1 billion zloty between the state budget and the Armed Forces Support Fund, and whether the fund's borrowing rises as the headline flattens.
    • Whether the defence ministry or the Armament Agency publishes the basis for the fifty-fifty claim, so it can be tested against the 30.4 billion zloty figure.
    • Whether SAFE money is contracted to Polish plants during 2027 or to work beginning in 2028 and later.
    • Whether the excessive deficit procedure produces a Commission or Council step while defence is held flat.

    Poland's defence share falls in 2027 not because policy changed but because the contracting wave of 2022-25 is now in delivery and the fiscal room has closed. The industrial pay-off is dated 2028 and beyond; the bills from Seoul and Washington are dated now.

    Sources

    Related publications